Restraining Order vs Protective Order: Key Differences

A protective order is a specific remedy available under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (PWDVA), while a restraining order is a broader term used for injunctions granted by civil courts or family courts under various personal laws. The protective order under the PWDVA is a statutory creation with defined reliefs, whereas a restraining order typically refers to a civil court's injunction restraining a person from doing a particular act.

Under Section 18 of the PWDVA, a Magistrate can pass a protection order that prohibits the respondent from committing acts of domestic violence, entering the shared household, or communicating with the aggrieved person. This order is criminal in nature—violation of a protection order is a cognizable and non-bailable offence under Section 31 of the PWDVA, punishable with imprisonment.

A restraining order, by contrast, is usually a civil remedy. For example, under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, a court may pass a decree for restitution of conjugal rights, which effectively restrains a spouse from withdrawing from the other's society. Similarly, under Section 38 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954, courts can grant injunctions to restrain a spouse from disposing of matrimonial property. These orders are enforced through civil contempt proceedings, not criminal prosecution.

The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 is the exclusive statute for obtaining a protective order in domestic violence cases. Section 12 of the PWDVA allows an aggrieved person (a woman or a child) to file a complaint before a Magistrate. The Magistrate, after hearing both parties, may pass a protection order under Section 18, which can include:

• Prohibiting the respondent from committing any act of domestic violence
• Restraining the respondent from entering the shared household
• Restraining the respondent from communicating with the aggrieved person
• Prohibiting the respondent from alienating assets or operating bank accounts

Additionally, the Magistrate can grant residence orders under Section 19, which may restrain the respondent from dispossessing the aggrieved person from the shared household. The procedure is governed by the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, making it faster than civil remedies. The application can be filed in the Magistrate's court having jurisdiction over the place where the aggrieved person resides or where the domestic violence occurred.

Yes, family courts have the power to grant restraining orders in matrimonial proceedings. Under the Family Courts Act, 1984, family courts can pass interim orders, including injunctions, to protect the rights of parties during the pendency of a case. For instance, in a divorce petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, the court may restrain a spouse from transferring matrimonial property or from harassing the other spouse.

Similarly, under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, the court can order maintenance pendente lite and litigation expenses, which effectively restrains a spouse from denying financial support. In cases under the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 or the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936, courts can pass interim orders for custody of children or protection of property.

However, a restraining order from a family court is a civil remedy. If the order is violated, the aggrieved party must file an application for contempt of court under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, which is a slower process compared to the criminal consequences of violating a protective order under the PWDVA.

The consequences differ significantly. Violation of a protective order under Section 31 of the PWDVA is a criminal offence. The respondent can be arrested without warrant, and upon conviction, may face imprisonment for up to one year or a fine, or both. The police have a duty to register an FIR and investigate the matter. The Magistrate can also extend the protection order or modify it.

Violation of a restraining order from a family court or civil court is dealt with under civil contempt. The aggrieved party must file a contempt petition, and the court may issue a show-cause notice. If contempt is proven, the court can impose a fine or imprisonment, but the process is initiated by the aggrieved party, not the police. The burden of proof is on the applicant, and the proceedings are civil in nature.

Practically, a protective order under the PWDVA offers faster and more effective enforcement because it involves the criminal justice system. A restraining order requires the aggrieved party to actively pursue contempt proceedings, which can be time-consuming.

If you are facing domestic violence, file an application under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 before a Magistrate to obtain a protective order. For matrimonial disputes involving property or custody, consult a family court advocate to determine whether a restraining order is appropriate. Each remedy serves a different purpose, and your advocate can guide you on the correct forum and procedure.

---

This page provides preliminary legal information about India Law. It is not legal advice and does not create an advocate-client relationship. For your matter, book a consultation with a licensed advocate.